ここから本文です
TWO:The trial of the chief prisoner lasted nine days. The jury brought in a verdict of guilty, but unanimously and strongly prayed that his life might be spared. It was generally understood that this recommendation would be acted upon, especially as the insurgents had killed none of the Queen's subjects, and their leader had done all in his power to dissuade them from the perpetration of crime. McManus and Meagher were next tried, and also found guilty, with a similar recommendation to mercy. When they were asked why sentence of death should not be passed upon them, Smith O'Brien answered that he was perfectly satisfied with the consciousness of having performed his duty to his country, and that he had done only what, in his opinion, it was the duty of every Irishman to have done. This no doubt would have been very noble language if there had been a certainty or even a likelihood that the sentence of death would be executed, but as no one expected it, there was perhaps a touch of the melodramatic in the tone of defiance adopted by the prisoners. The Government acted towards them with the greatest forbearance and humanity. They brought a writ of error before the House of Lords on account of objections to the jury panel; but the sentence of the court was confirmed. The sentence of death was commuted to transportation for life; but they protested against this and insisted on their legal right to be either hanged or set free, in consequence of which an Act was passed quickly through Parliament to remove all doubt about the right of the Crown to commute the sentence. The convicts were sent to Van Diemen's Land, where they were allowed to go about freely, on their parole. Meagher and McManus ultimately escaped to America, and Smith O'Brien after some years obtained a free pardon, and was permitted to return home to his family, but without feeling the least gratitude to the Government, or losing the conviction that he had only done his duty to his country. Mr. (afterwards Sir) Gavan Duffy was tried for high treason in Dublin, in February, 1849, but the jury disagreed. He was again tried in April following, when the same thing occurred, and Mr. Duffy gave security to appear again, if required, himself in 1,000.

Alcohol distillation

Since establishment, our company has been manufacturing and delivering various types of chemical machinery. In particular, we have been a trailblazer in the growth and development of alcohol distillation technology in Japan and over more than 80 years, we have delivered numerous distillation plant.
Our sophisticated products, developed on the back of deep experience and extensive skills honed over those years, continue to be rated very highly by our clients.

Delivery Record: Distillation plant / Major alcoholic beverage company
We delivered a beverage alcohol distillation plant with one of the largest capability in Japan. This plant integrates our all-out effort and the latest technologies, having a breakthrough process capable of quality improvement, energy saving and automatization (full automated using distributed control system). Our single-source-responsibility from design and manufacturing to on-site construction and commissioning achieved successful completion as originally planned and has led to the stable operation to the present. With the experience of leading the industry as a top manufacturer of distillation plant in Japan, we will meet the needs and expectations of our clients, and sincerely hope to contribute to our clients who require our help.